'www' is a worse acronym than 'LOL'.
By
Oscar J Carlton IV
on February 06, 2007
Any acronym that takes three times as long to say as its spelled-out version is inefficient. And it's even more overused.
Agreed
47
59
44.3% 55.7%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
This claim was inspired by
Claims inspired by this one
Similar claims
- 61-2 The tagging syntax on flickr.com, del.icio.us, and jyte.com are all different
- 28-14 Web 2.0 needs a new name, like 'A website with thought put into it'
- 55-69 When replying to an email or mailing list post, your reply should go BELOW the quoted text
- 21-59 The acronym "Ajax" (asynchronous JavaScript and XML) should be written with a capital "A" and lowercase "jax".
- 27-4 It annoys me when people double-click web links.
Discussion (3)
Your browser location bar reflects my feelings about www.
yeah, http://www. is redundant.
See also http://no-www.org/