(-- Ani DiFranco, among others)
or shatters.
shattering is a form of breaking, yes.
Shadoopie.
(Shadoobie?)
Obviously you haven't heard of ductile items, elastic items, or the immovable object.
IME elastic items bend and then bend back, and i have no proof there exists an immovable object.
ductility seems beside the point -- even ductile things either bend (as does, say, copper) or break.
Vynce: there is no unstoppable force; therefore an immovable object exists
wow. that's the worst logic i've seen all week.
I broke yours with it though
Your "normal" logic is rigid and inflexible
Enter an OpenID to invite a Jyter to this claim, or an email address to invite someone new to Jyte.
Discussion (9)
or shatters.
shattering is a form of breaking, yes.
Shadoopie.
(Shadoobie?)
Obviously you haven't heard of ductile items, elastic items, or the immovable object.
IME elastic items bend and then bend back, and i have no proof there exists an immovable object.
ductility seems beside the point -- even ductile things either bend (as does, say, copper) or break.
Vynce: there is no unstoppable force; therefore an immovable object exists
wow. that's the worst logic i've seen all week.
I broke yours with it though
Your "normal" logic is rigid and inflexible