Agreed
11
11
50.0% 50.0%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
This claim was inspired by
Claims inspired by this one
Similar claims
- 4-9 I have managed to kill the hard drive in an iPod or other portable, ahrd drive based MP3/Ogg/AAC/etc. player.
- 6-3 I have accidentally used 'banned' electronic device through the take-off or landing of an airplane.
- 15-7 Bottled beer without twist-off caps tastes better on average than easy-access beer.
- 36-2 Banning iPods and mobile phones at NYC crosswalks would be a major inconvenience to pedestrians.
- 256-7 Music Bought From iTunes, Zune, etc. Should Play on ANY Device, and Not Just Their Own
Discussion (8)
On the other hand, it's not as unintuitive as a lot of small consumer electronics. It rarely takes me more than 2 or 3 actions to get the result I want. (Of course, it only has about 6 affordances, so maybe that's just chance…)
But after you get used to it it's like riding a bike.
Or like riding a mountain lion.
and then i'm lucky to have penchant for figuring out UIs of many devices without having to read a manual, which many people tried and gave up on.
well, i think it's has the most intuitive ui of all the media player i've used so far. when i can figure an ui out easily without having to read a manual, i'd say the ui is intuitive, to me.
patrick: though i'd be surprised if it was easy to get it to do the thigns i want it to do.
maybe it can't ata ll.
i've never managed to queue up a song to play after the current one without interrupting the current one, or gotten it to shuffle-by-album.
would that play the tracks of one album in a random order, or whole albums in order selected at random?
the atter is what i wanted.
(as opposed to the former, which i would call shuffle-within-album or shuffle-album)