The "ignore" ability, to selectively ignore a personal list of Jyte users one chooses, obviates the need for Jyte to pre-emptively protect one from that user.
By
bignose
on March 15, 2007
Agreed
9
7
56.3% 43.7%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
This claim was inspired by
- bignose's comment on Jyte should follow through on "Really, it can be anything you want" and not censor claims.
Similar claims
- 28-1 Rejecting claims based on "potentially offensive words" is unwanted by the Jyte community.
- 16-2 Jyte should follow through on "Really, it can be anything you want" and not censor claims.
- 25-1 Jyte should, if legal liability is a concern, choose to disclaim responsibility for what authors write, rather than censor.
- 17-1 Moderation of content is best done by the Jyte community itself, rather than a pre-posting automated filter algorithm.
- 48-4 Jyte works with javascript disabled.
Discussion (3)
See this claim.
Perhaps it will if the system aggregated a bunch of ignore lists and then made Disrespectful Jerkface ignored by new users as well. But having each and every user discover who they need to avoid the hard way is not, I think, something that builds a welcoming community.
Okay, I'm less certain than initially on this claim.
And now I dearly wish for a feature meeting this claim :-)