3
7
30.0% 70.0%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
Similar claims
- 67-1 One should attempt to avoid ambiguity when making a claim
- 37-17 An unstoppable force would destroy an immovable object.
- 5-23 "An unstoppable force would destroy an immovable object" should be rewritten as "An unstoppable force that was incapable of going any direction but through an object that was immovable but destructible, would destroy the object."
- 110-13 On Jyte, I vote on such deeply serious claims and such terribly silly claims in quick succession that I can hear my brain grinding as it shifts gears.
- 16-9 I agree to disagree
Discussion (20)
Proceed with this nonsense forthwith!
Hell, Pyle, I like you.
Seems like the redead guy's spelling is improving.
nosnesne
What would be the sense without the nonsense. There is no light without dark. You want the whole world to implode?
wot wood be flomingos with no hed? aha aha.
mingos
bingoz!
I would be Igore
That wouldn't do.
No, most certainly not.
stun open oath isle noon wins been seat
boing boing mahoney!
bouncy fella aren't ya?
bunsi bunsi like a carsul. eat your naybor, hees an arsol.
there's lots of crazy shit going down at the moment.
yearrrgghh!
fuck! i've just noticed ... that redneck has, like, an eye in, like, his hat.
spooky.
that is weird. i wonder if his eye can see me running away.