One of the reasons to not give negative cred is eximplefied by the fact that the more people tag you with "bad speller", the more weight you carry when you tell others their spelling is bad.
By
Glad Rag Kraken
on February 13, 2007
One of the reasons to not give negative cred is illuminated by the fact that the more one is tagged with "bad speller", the more weight one carries when telling others their spelling is bad.
Agreed
23
1
95.8% 4.2%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
Similar claims
- 1-23 You can give the same cred to the same person as many times as you like.
- 14-0 One can retain a cred score if cred is given and then removed by someone with a cred score.
- 22-5 Looking at who has given cred to whom is just as interesting as looking at claims.
- 25-10 Making fun of someone in a claim is the only decent way to get back at someone on Jyte
- 11-1 Neither Rob Caskey nor Quotes and Philosophy can take a hint
Discussion (9)
Ooops, I thought I had fixed exemplified.
I love irony.
on a related note, if you have already given me bad speller cred, I'm not complaining, please don't remove it. I have plans. Horrible horrible plans.
LOL, I guess you're talking about me. Well, you make a comment somewhere saying nobody would give you "spells real good" cred, so I gave you "spells real bad" cred instead.
But if you're a really bad speller, wouldn't you better be able to identify others of your kind? The whole takes one to know one thing? Or maybe that's a flaw in the schoolyard taunt.
What value "bad speller" is? What method or formula to calculate it?
On a completely unrelated topic to what otong was getting at, someone *Jon*, removed my "spells real bad" cred. This makes me sad.
Negative cred is HOAX, bullshit. Anyway, thank you Ben :)
Ben: OK, I've given it back. Enjoy rejoicing in mispelled goodness.