Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

By 8 Vynce on May 12, 2008

Embed Claim Make a related claim

Discussion (14)

http://bcat.myopenid.com/

10 Jonathan Rascher who hasn't voted, says

Having glanced at the WP article, I prefer "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but keep your eyes open." There's certainly a lot of malice in the world. It may be somewhat dwarfed by stupidity, but it's still there.

Make a related claim 3 months ago (link)
http://vynce.myopenid.com/

8 Vynce who agreed, says

yeah, "assume" Is key here.

Make a related claim 3 months ago (link)
http://logicaldog.myopenid.com/

4 Logical Dog who disagreed, says

Agree with JR, "but keep your eyes open". "Never" does not suggest sufficient cautiousness to me. Therefore, disagree.

Make a related claim 3 months ago (link)
http://vynce.myopenid.com/

8 Vynce who agreed, says

to me "keep your eyes open" reinforces (or qualifies) the "adequately" already in the original Razor.

Make a related claim 3 months ago (link)
http://darch.myopenid.com/

6 D'Archangel who agreed, says

"Adequately" is the key word. See also this user.

D'A

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
http://eratosthenes.myopenid.com/

5 ◇□ who agreed, says

That's nice.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
http://dewe.myopenid.com/

1 XISTH information who hasn't voted, says

this is not a claim.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
https://getopenid.com/sassen

3 Rolies who hasn't voted, says

With this claim Vynce admits that language is a beautiful game and nothing else. This contradicts some of his former claims, and that is o.k..

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
http://dewe.myopenid.com/

1 XISTH information who hasn't voted, says

it is an imperative, not a claim.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
https://getopenid.com/sassen

3 Rolies who hasn't voted, says

It is an imperative claim, oliebol.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
http://eratosthenes.myopenid.com/

5 ◇□ who agreed, says

DeWe:

When reading an imperoclaim, I think there is an understood "we should" or "one should" in front of the claim, so this claim becomes:

"one should never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)

Claims inspired by this comment

There is a silence in any a voice.
http://dewe.myopenid.com/

1 XISTH information who hasn't voted, says

That's still an imperative. The full correct expansion is 'I believe one should ...'.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
http://eratosthenes.myopenid.com/

5 ◇□ who agreed, says

potato potato.

The point is that the statement (non-imperative) is implicit in the imperoclaim.

http://vynce.myopenid.com/

8 Vynce who agreed, says

Try again, DeWe. "One should" is not an imperative.

Make a related claim 2 months ago (link)
Sign in in to leave a comment.