Having glanced at the WP article, I prefer "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but keep your eyes open." There's certainly a lot of malice in the world. It may be somewhat dwarfed by stupidity, but it's still there.
Discussion (14)
Having glanced at the WP article, I prefer "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but keep your eyes open." There's certainly a lot of malice in the world. It may be somewhat dwarfed by stupidity, but it's still there.
yeah, "assume" Is key here.
Agree with JR, "but keep your eyes open". "Never" does not suggest sufficient cautiousness to me. Therefore, disagree.
to me "keep your eyes open" reinforces (or qualifies) the "adequately" already in the original Razor.
"Adequately" is the key word. See also this user.
D'A
That's nice.
this is not a claim.
With this claim Vynce admits that language is a beautiful game and nothing else. This contradicts some of his former claims, and that is o.k..
it is an imperative, not a claim.
It is an imperative claim, oliebol.
DeWe:
When reading an imperoclaim, I think there is an understood "we should" or "one should" in front of the claim, so this claim becomes:
"one should never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Claims inspired by this comment
There is a silence in any a voice.That's still an imperative. The full correct expansion is 'I believe one should ...'.
potato potato.
The point is that the statement (non-imperative) is implicit in the imperoclaim.
Claims inspired by this comment
The expression "potato potato" does not work on the internet.Try again, DeWe. "One should" is not an imperative.