Must one still use the buzz word "Web 2.0" ?

By 1 luc legay on March 28, 2007

Tags: web 2.0, web2.0
Embed Claim Make a related claim

Discussion (7)

http://scc4fun.myopenid.com/

2 Sean C who disagreed, says

No, one must use the buzz word web 3.0 now.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://david.harris.name/

1 David Harris who disagreed, says

I have always called it "web beta".

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://bignose.whitetree.org/

2 bignose who agreed, says

Since this claim is phrased as a question, I agree that the question should be asked.

I think the answer to the question is a firm "No".

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://claimid.com/xtof

3 Christophe Ducamp who disagreed, says

agree with bignose. firm "no". please, be cool with luc legay...

@luc please feel at ease on jyte : just reword claims in french like
1/"Je ne poserai plus jamais de questions sur Jyte." or
2/ "Jyte devrait être traduit en français."

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://luc.myopenid.com/

1 luc legay who agreed, says

Perhaps Jyte must not be used to ask questions... but only to give assertions...

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://alexisrael.myopenid.com/

No_score Alexandre ISRAËL who agreed, says

Is the question about the web or about the buzz?
I answered about the web.
Obviously buzz is gone as it became a reality. Buzz is 3.0

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://charles.nepote.myopenid.com/

1 Charles Nepote who agreed, says

Since 4 or five years, isn't there new ways of making, using and experementig the web ?
I think so.
A new thing should have a name, isn't it ? Why not web 2.0 ? What else ?

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
Sign in in to leave a comment.