Learning to speak Klingon is a complete waste of time

By 1 antigamer.com on February 23, 2007

Embed Claim Make a related claim

Discussion (12)

http://omu.myopenid.com/

1 Olav who disagreed, says

Learning ANYTHING is never a waste of time as it teaches you ... LEARNING.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://bmaher.myopenid.com/

1 brim4brim who agreed, says

Learning Klingon being the sole exception to the above rule.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://antigamer.com/

1 antigamer.com who agreed, says

LOLPWND!

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://wikitravel.org/en/User:Mark

3 Mark J who disagreed, says

Well, constructed languages can provide some insight into how language works in the first place, so no, it's not a complete waste of time. Of course there are more useful constructed languages out there.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://cobrabaghdad.myopenid.com/

7 Cobra Baghdad who agreed, says

I think learning Tsolyáni is less of a waste of time. And for the record, I think beating your forehead into a plastered wall is less a waste of time than learning Tsolyáni.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://arabianight.myopenid.com/

2 Has a picture with Ron Paul who disagreed, says

not a COMPLETE waste of time... there have got to be some hot chicks who dig guys who speak klingon... somewhere out there.... somewhere!

Make a related claim 10 months ago (link)
http://vynce.myopenid.com/

8 Vynce who disagreed, says

yes, but two of them are poly.

http://ozamosi.flukkost.nu/

3 ozamosi who disagreed, says

I back up my position with the Saphir-Whorf hypothesis

No, not Worf. Whorf.

Make a related claim 9 months ago (link)
http://cobrabaghdad.myopenid.com/

7 Cobra Baghdad who agreed, says

But artificial languages no one speaks don't really work like that. It isn't the language that changes the way you think, it's the culture. The difference between an English and Spanish speaker is less about vowel sounds and more about concepts like the perminancy of relationships, signs of which exist in their languages, but it's the culture that gives it significance.

There is no real Klingon culture.

Make a related claim 9 months ago (link)
http://vynce.myopenid.com/

8 Vynce who disagreed, says

but it was created by people who were real, and so probably reflects interesting things abut the way they peak. also, there is a real culture of klingon speakers, even if they are not native klingon speakers.

and if there are artificial constraints, so what? it still affects the way you think, and possibly give you a new way to think, which may be useful someday.

brain exercise. it's got value.

Make a related claim 9 months ago (link)
http://ozamosi.flukkost.nu/

3 ozamosi who disagreed, says

Actually, Lojban (or rather it's predecessor, Loglan - both names means "logical language" in their respective language) was created just because of that hypothesis. It's meant to be so ridiculously flexible, that complex concepts will become easy, which should mean that you'll be able to think about things in ways you couldn't otherwise. After having studied it for a while, I realized that while all concepts are quite easy to grasp, just mapping them to "normal language" is extremely complex, because the language just doesn't work like it "should", something I took as proof that it actually does give me new ways to think. Or rather, it would have, if I'd actually learned it properly...

Make a related claim 9 months ago (link)
http://ozamosi.flukkost.nu/

3 ozamosi who disagreed, says

...because of that, I refuse to accept that Klingon would be waste of time, for the exact same reason.

Make a related claim 9 months ago (link)
Sign in in to leave a comment.