It seems that on Jyte there's always a few idiots who will disagree with something demonstrably true

:-p

I take issue with the word 'few'. It connotates a much smaller percentage of contrarians than actually exist.

The number of people disagreeing will show that this claim is not "demonstratably true."

Hell, "demonstratably" isn't even a word... you meant "demonstratively."

Or "demonstrably" is fine, too.

lol, tad

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=demonstratably

No results found for demonstratably.
Did you mean demonstrably (in dictionary)?
Dictionary suggestions:
demonstrably
demonstratedly
demonstrable
demonstratively

This is a word I came across a lot in books, articles, etc on science topics. It means that it can be demonstrated. What I'm saying is that people will disagree with things that can be shown to be true quite easily

Yeah, and "demonstrable" and "demonstrative" have somewhat different meanings.

Methinks Tad misread the claim.

I just thought that "demonstratably" would sound more like "demonstratively" than "demonstrably"... how should I know which one he was going for?

Context?

It definitely said "demonstratably" when I read it this morning... of course, I may have been slightly hung over.

But, in typical American fashion, I am right and somehow he found a way to edit the claim text after I pointed out his error.

hahaha, clever :P

I disagree with the statement that they're idiots. Also, not all claims that are demonstrably true are to all people. I think idiots post "demostrably true" claims without posting any description and then act like assholes when people disagree.

Oh come ON people. No one is going to pick on him for saying "there's" instead of "they're"? I'm totally disappointed.

Who me? In the claim? what?

Yes. They *are* always a few idiots. Psha. :P

Foo. There are, not they are.

Yeah, I realize "there's" ("there is") doesn't match in number with "a few", but the the "they're" confused me there

"There're"?

+1 with Ralph