"Intelligent design" is a rebranding of "creation science" which is a rebranding of creationism.

as a creationist
who wants to be called a creationist
i disagree

creationists are a radical subset of intelegent design proponants

we believe the genisis 1-11 acount

all they believe is that some intelegent designer did somthing

As an ignorant fucktard who doesn't know shit about shit, you should learn what words mean. Your comment exposes you as ignorant of science and your own history.

Far be it from me to suggest you do something difficult like learn science (or spelling). But I'd think you'd be ashamed to show the world how little you know about the political movement you claim to be a part of.

Hint: Don't come back until you know the significance of _Edwards v. Aguillard_. I mean, you *could*, but then I'd have to insult your intelligence and integrity as well as your knowledge.

D'A

creationism is not intelligent design;
therefore "rebranding" is not the right word to use.

rebranding is changing the name of a product, it does not involve changing the product itself.

In this as in all things, Protagoras, you are an ignorant fuckwit.

D'A

i read about the court decision, all i'm saying is that creationism (as the term is usually used) is more extreme and specific than intelligent design, the two are different.

And by doing so, you are lying. Plainly and simply.

D'A