Agreed
35
13
72.9% 27.1%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
Claims inspired by this one
Similar claims
- 238-4 Subversion is better than CVS.
- 8-22 Darcs is better than Subversion.
- 32-4 Mercurial needs a Tortoise(SVN|CVS)-like Shell Extension to be successful on Windows
- 34-3 Conflicts in Source Control are not fun.
- 40-6 Distributed source control systems are better than centralized source control systems.
Discussion (3)
I've agreed because I presume you mean "subversion"
Sometimes I'll pull code but that's it. I wouldn't call that using it...
I'm fairly fond of SVN. It's what CVS was supposed to be. It's not perfect, and I'm sure one of the other version control systems out there is better in some way, but it's open source and it's good enough, so I haven't bothered looking at the competition.