I remember nights when the new claims just kept flying by.

Where has everyone gone?

I think D'A ate some of them.

I would vote on this, except I dislike your tags and your attitude about them. Since your tagging shows your claim to be unimportant, I don't see a reason to treat it otherwise.

@Rachel, so now we judge the merits of a claim base solely on the tags? I think that's a little harsh, and I must say I don't think you have any idea about my attitude toward tags simply because of one claim. Glance through my claims and you'll see I tag pretty well. I've even changed tags based on the input of some of the OJ's. I'll go so far as to say I've earned the right to spoof a couple tags on one claim. Keep your vote if you must. I'm cool with it.

Yes, because a claim that is not well tagged is a claim that can not be well found again. Not tagging a claim well sends the message that the claim is not worth finding or caring about. I try not to vote on claims that are marked as unimportant or not worth it.

I will not judge all of your claims based on this claim's tags. But I will judge this claim based on its tags.

Tagged and bagged just for you Rach.

How 'bout some commas, Bruce? :)

and a smile?

Commas for you Jon.

Thank you kindly.