It'd be interesting to hear what someone who agreed with the claim had for their reasoning. I guess only those that feel strongly are the ones that actually discuss.
Missed the boat on this comment thread, but just in case.
I'll vote for Clinton in the presidential election because her opposition most likely will be less appetizing. If she's as aggressive as Oboma in slapping down FOX when they, inevitably, make unfounded claims, I'll vote for her in the primary as well.
Jeremy: I'm afraid moving to Canada won't save you from Hillary's wrath, I quote her trying to defend Israel's action in Lebanon recently:
"I want us here in New York to imagine if extremist terrorists were launching rocket attacks across the Mexican or Canadian border, would we stand by or would we defend America against these attacks from extremists?"
So... If any crazy fundamentalist in Canada launches a rocket attack on the US, she'll invade.
She gets way too hot-headed about things before she has all the information. While I hate to sound like a basement-dweller; any political candidate that allied themselves with an extremist whack-job like Jack Thompson can't be trusted in my book.
Her problem is that she reacts first, thinks afterwards and that scares me.
Oh yeah. Because Globalism is the greatest thing EVER. Globalism is wrong. It shouldn't happen. James Paul Warburg "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." People like you will support World Government.
Globalism is here. We can't roll up our borders and close the airports, and we'd be stupid to do it even if it were possible.
We need laws for international commerce, extradition of criminals, environmental protection, and intellectual property rights, among other issues. One country making its own laws doesn't work by itself, because another country can make different laws. There needs to be a more cooperative and international body to ensure that all people are treated fairly.
Globalism is here. We can't roll up our borders and close the airports.
But we also cannot let unofficial, unelected foreign bodies redefine our borders, and decide the fate and destroy the sovereignty of the country many of our ancestors died to protect.
If change is to happen it should happen out in the open, and it should be the will and the way of the people, and above all should observe and protect individual liberty and freedom.
I would've and I did. She's too polarizing. Her negatives are too high. She'll never get enough independents to win the general. People see this and do not want to risk another four years of what we've had.
Discussion (29)
D'oh! Here's a link to
That video with sound
Hillary is too authoritarian for my tastes. She voted for the PATRIOT act, and
called for federal regulation of video games. And she voted in favor of the authorization of military force in Iraq, a huge strike against her in my book.
See her voting record
Too divisive a pick for my taste. I'll relocate to Canada or the moon if we have another Bush v. Clinton election.
I'm with you on that.
socialist
It'd be interesting to hear what someone who agreed with the claim had for their reasoning. I guess only those that feel strongly are the ones that actually discuss.
Missed the boat on this comment thread, but just in case.
I'll vote for Clinton in the presidential election because her opposition most likely will be less appetizing. If she's as aggressive as Oboma in slapping down FOX when they, inevitably, make unfounded claims, I'll vote for her in the primary as well.
Jeremy: I'm afraid moving to Canada won't save you from Hillary's wrath, I quote her trying to defend Israel's action in Lebanon recently:
"I want us here in New York to imagine if extremist terrorists were launching rocket attacks across the Mexican or Canadian border, would we stand by or would we defend America against these attacks from extremists?"
So... If any crazy fundamentalist in Canada launches a rocket attack on the US, she'll invade.
The thing is Canada, unlike Lebanon, won't harbor fundamentalists (who, by the way, are not at all crazy, just very well funded).
no way!
She gets way too hot-headed about things before she has all the information. While I hate to sound like a basement-dweller; any political candidate that allied themselves with an extremist whack-job like Jack Thompson can't be trusted in my book.
Her problem is that she reacts first, thinks afterwards and that scares me.
I will change my vote to agree if she gets the nomination.
Claims inspired by this comment
I would vote for Hillary Clinton if she received the Democratic presidential nomination.sorry - too liberal for my tastes.
She's pretty durn conservative.
Hillary runs windows:
http://www.douglaskarr.com/2007/06/23/2008-elections-by-server/
misterpoll.com: 2008 Presidential Candidates
She is a crazy bitch.
Says the guy with "Ron Paul" in his handle...
Have you even researched Ron Paul? For once in a long time we don't have to choose the lesser evil in the presidential elections!
RP is a throwback to an era that - thankfully - no longer exists.
Oh yeah. Because Globalism is the greatest thing EVER. Globalism is wrong. It shouldn't happen. James Paul Warburg "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." People like you will support World Government.
Claims inspired by this comment
Gravity is wrong.Globalism is here. We can't roll up our borders and close the airports, and we'd be stupid to do it even if it were possible.
We need laws for international commerce, extradition of criminals, environmental protection, and intellectual property rights, among other issues. One country making its own laws doesn't work by itself, because another country can make different laws. There needs to be a more cooperative and international body to ensure that all people are treated fairly.
Globalism is here. We can't roll up our borders and close the airports.
But we also cannot let unofficial, unelected foreign bodies redefine our borders, and decide the fate and destroy the sovereignty of the country many of our ancestors died to protect.
If change is to happen it should happen out in the open, and it should be the will and the way of the people, and above all should observe and protect individual liberty and freedom.
DW: Treaties drafted by unelected diplomats must be ratified by elected officials before they take effect. I don't understand the problem.
I give up.
I hope you all vote.
Who'd of thought Hillary would crap out in the primaries tho.... she's pretty much gone....
I would've and I did. She's too polarizing. Her negatives are too high. She'll never get enough independents to win the general. People see this and do not want to risk another four years of what we've had.
She had a spirited interview with Bill O'Reilly. Worth watching.