Haskell is the best programming language that exists today

By 3 j3h on January 27, 2007

It has a unique combination of purity and practicality that is not found in other programming languages. It has a welcoming community and ever-improving documentation. There are definite drawbacks, but so far, I've seen nothing to compare.

I ♥ λ

Embed Claim Make a related claim

Discussion (9)

http://joelmichael.myopenid.com/

2 Joel Hayhurst who disagreed, says

nothing practical about functional

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://rorek.org/

8 Rorek who hasn't voted, says

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://rorek.org/

8 Rorek who hasn't voted, says

I just wish people (ahem, j3h) wouldn't make broad statements about what's better without backing them up.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://dannohung.idproxy.net/

2 DannoHung who hasn't voted, says

I feel unqualified to make a statement like this, A) because I haven't been programming in Haskell and B) because I feel hard pressed to declare language superiority at all, but having grokked monads and what they do to the design of your program, Haskell is clearly hella awesome.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://angerfist.myopenid.com/

No_score angerfist who hasn't voted, says

The claim that functional programming is not practical and is, by implication, not important in software is absolutely preposterous.

Function is the most central and fundamental idea in computing. To say that functions (and therefore functional programming) are not worth taking seriously is to say that it is not worth it to bother with these "computer" contraptions.

Particular implementations may not be practical for common applications, but that is a very different claim from saying that functional programming is not practical.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://www.omnifarious.org/~hopper/

1 Omnifarious who hasn't voted, says

I disagree that function is the most central and fundamental idea. I think it's very important, but you place it at a pinnacle is doesn't deserve, or at least that it should share.

For example, Turing machines have no functions at all. I think they are more centrally relevant to computing than any construct that's essentially an engineering shorthand (albeit an indispensable one).

Of course, there's lambda calculus, which is an equivalent formulation of the same ideas as the Turing machine. But in lambda calculus the function is the most important entity.

So, at best I think functions share the position of being central and fundamental with turing machines. And the culture of software engineering has generally tended to favor the turing machine formulation over the lambda calculus one, though not overwhelmingly so or we wouldn't have scheme, lisp, Haskell, etc. all.

http://kybernetikos.com/openid/

4 kybernetikos who hasn't voted, says

I love how simple and neat small to medium sized programs are. Anything that makes much use of monads gets pretty scary pretty quickly.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://thither.myopenid.com/

No_score thither.myopenid.com who hasn't voted, says

Haskell might have been the best language in a world where befunge had never been invented.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://bignose.whitetree.org/

2 bignose who disagreed, says

You claim to ♥ λ, but then confuse this with Haskell.

The λ is, and always will, refer to Lisp more than any other programming language.

Sign in in to leave a comment.