5
3
62.5% 37.5%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
This claim was inspired by
- ididak's comment on Each cred transaction should have binary attribute - marking does giving this cred person treat it as "positive cred" or as "negative cred"
Similar claims
- 4-6 Each cred transaction should have binary attribute - marking does giving this cred person treat it as "positive cred" or as "negative cred"
- 3-15 Negative creds should be prohibited!
- 6-0 Jyte do not distinguish positive and negative creds
- 15-0 Jyte do not distinguish positive and negative creds while calculating "Overall" cred
- 7-9 Ignoring a user should allow one to give anticred to that user, explaining why.
Discussion (4)
I quite like your other idea, that negative cred is negative valued positive cred. So you can't give some "stupid" cred, but you can give them "-clever" cred, which is offset by any "clever" cred they might have.
kybernetikos
my both ideas are not about widening creds "namespace"
but - about how to express explcitly (by cred donor) that the cred is negative.
This one - about "-" - I like particularly because it's just a convention which does not need any coding
The problem is that -stupid could be interpreted as meaning that the person is not stupid.
Ok, let it be not "-stupid" but "stupid~". Or "stupid*".