All claims that have been caught and corrected by the tag police should also be tagged with 'tag busted'.
By
Wyscan the Giant
on April 03, 2007
Corrected means that the original poster has added the tags. Feel free to suggest something better.
Agreed
11
16
40.7% 59.3%
Embed Claim
Make a related claim
This claim was inspired by
Similar claims
- 13-9 If you make a claim that you wish you could delete, but can't, you should delete all of its tags instead.
- 7-8 I am lazier about tagging my claims now that I know I can go back and edit them later
- 31-1 Vynce is the jyte tag police.
- 2-20 Claimants should take care to order their tags
- 6-15 I look for claims to vote through tags
Discussion (7)
Oh, and I just thought of this: tag it with "officer [name]" after the citing officer. So, it should Vynce should write:
Please tag with jyte, culture, "tag busted", and "officer vynce"
No way I'm going back to all the claims that I updated after pressure from the tag police just to label them 'tag busted'.
Even worse, then all my claims that passed tag police inspection after changes would once again be in violation.
I intend to add 'tag busted' to any future changes, however.
^_^;; I just went back and added "tag busted" to my claim.
Of course, of course. No need for it to be retroactive if you don't wish it.
what does this add other than red tape? if you want to see tag editing history, ask for a tag editing history feature, wiki style.
I just thought it would be fun with no additional development time for new features. The additional red tape seems minimal. Hell, I also think that people refusing to add tags after being cited should add the tag "tag defiance".
sorry, i didn't mean to be harsh; i just think that "tag busted" actually slightly degrades the usefulness of tags, though it doesn't if the tags are widespread enough.
had this been tagged "silly" or "fun" i may have gone easier on it. then again, i may not; it's been a long couple of days.