A nation cannot be Christian or Jewish or Muslim, only it's people can be.

By 2 Tom Morris on May 02, 2007

I'm fed up of people talking about the 'Christian nation' or the 'Muslim nation'. We don't have an 'existentialist nation' or a 'utilitarian nation'. Philosophical and religious positions are held by individuals, not countries.

Embed Claim Make a related claim

Discussion (6)

http://sethrates.myopenid.com/

3 Sethrates who disagreed, says

What else would you call it if a nation's government and legal structures are built explicitly upon a particular interpretation of a religion?

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://lala.moon.myopenid.com/

2 lala who disagreed, says

A nation not in the sense of a state, but of a group of people with distinct identity which is based on common history, ancestry, and language, might also include religion as part of its definition.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://packers1.myopenid.com/

4 Packers who disagreed, says

I can't agree on this one:

You are attributing more significane to 'shared territory' when a nation is also defined by shared descent, beliefs, language and history.

Modern borders these days are so arbitrary - e.g. Pakistan / Kasmir India - that a lot of terrorism is inspired by uniting peoples who have been artificially separated.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://packers1.myopenid.com/

4 Packers who disagreed, says

I do understand where you are coming from though ... allegiances outside of those shared by a country sometimes seem to tear peoples and loyalties apart.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://wikitravel.org/en/User:Mark

3 Mark J who disagreed, says

The people are a Nation. The country they live in is a different entity.

Make a related claim about 1 year ago (link)
http://aoe3rules.myopenid.com/

2 aoe3rules who agreed, says

your grammer is wrong. you maent "its".

Make a related claim 3 months ago (link)
Sign in in to leave a comment.